6.5 Grendel vs 6.8 SPC: A Different Perspective

The 6.5 Grendel vs 6.8 SPC debate can get ugly.

However, I’m not out to bash either of them because there’s ZERO reason to.  They are both Fantastic cartridges that allow the AR-15 to perform FAR beyond what it was originally designed for.

But they are different.

So I’m going to explain the differences between them WITHOUT any childish “my cartridge can beat your cartridge” talk.

Then I’m going to explain why it doesn’t matter as much as everyone thinks it does.

(Honest disclaimer: I like the 6.5 Grendel better, but the 6.8 SPC is an amazing cartridge)

First of all, The VAST majority of us don’t reload.  As such I’m going to limit myself to factory ammo only.

Before 6.8 fans cry foul because of the 6.8 SPCII chamber, remember that the Grendel II chamber exists, and has the exact same amount of performance increase over the original Grendel.

(Both the 6.5 Grendel and 6.8 SPC were released with less than ideal chamber dimensions.  These were  corrected on BOTH of them.  The changes allow for a roughly 100-200 FPS increase in velocity with BOTH cartridges)

That’s data only reloaders really need.  The rest of us (me included) will be buying factory ammo. So again:

I‘m comparing factory ammo only and basing performance on that.

So, shall we?

6.5 Grendel vs 6.8 SPC: Ballistics

If you don’t know what Sectional Density is, I HIGHLY recommend reading My article on Sectional Density before continuing.  Now that’s out of the way.

6.5 Grendel wins in Sectional Density.  The 6.8mm bullet is larger than the 6.5mm bullet.  There’s no getting around that.

You’ll be hard pressed to find 6.8 SPC ammo heavier than 120 grains (Sectional Density .223), but it does exist. 6.5 Grendel is available in factory loaded ammo up to 129 grains. (Sectional Density .264)

Neither cartridge does it’s best with heavier bullets though, and here’s why.

6.5 Grendel vs 6.8 SPC Cutaway

Notice how far the bullets stick into the case?  Heavier bullets are even longer, and longer bullets mean less space for gunpowder. That means lower bullet velocities.

(Someone will ask “What about the SSA 6.8 140 grain loading?” First, it requires a SPCII chamber.  Second, it’s longer than case spec at 2.300 inches vs the spec 2.260 inches.  It MUST be loaded longer than spec or the ogive will be below the case mouth)


The 6.5 Grendel gets the optimum balance of velocity to bullet weight at around 100- 123 grains.  The 6.8 hits this balance in the 100-120 grain range.

  • The Grendel can do 123gr bullet Bullets with a Sectional Density of .252.
  • The 6.8 SPC highest is .223 with 120gr bullet.

Higher Sectional Densities mean more aerodynamic bullets.

Fortunately, Hornady produces both the 6.5 Grendel and 6.8 SPC in their SST bullet (accurate, low drag hunting ammo) so we can compare them “apples-to-apples“. 123 Grains for the Grendel, 120 Grains for the SPC.  Both velocities are out of 16” barrels.

Here’s what their trajectories look like:

6.5 Grendel vs 6.8 SPC Trajectory 16 barrel

Bullet “A” is the 6.5 Grendel. Bullet “B” is the 6.8 SPC

The 6.8 starts out 100 FPS faster.  They’re almost identical at 250 Yards, and the Grendel is 100 FPS faster at 500 yards.  Otherwise, until about 500-600 yards, they’re isn’t much difference.

Thanks to it’s more aerodynamic bullet, The Grendel and SPC are neck and neck for a long way even with the 6.8 SPC starting 100 FPS faster.

Move the barrel lengths up, the Grendel will start to take a more significant lead…  But not enough to leave the 6.8 in the Dust. And that brings up another point

The 6.8 SPC’s Great Virtue AND Great Fault

The 6.8 really doesn’t gain a lot of velocity from barrels longer than 16″ inches.  This is both a blessing and curse.  It allows great performance from short barrels.  However it doesn’t really allow you to get more velocity from a longer barrel.  (you get some, but not as much a 6.5 Grendel)

This chart shows them starting at the same velocity (the 6.5 Grendel 24″ barrel velocity, which I suspect is around the 24″ 6.8 velocity, but I haven’t found data to support that)

6.5 Grendel vs 6.8 SPC Trajectory 24 barrel

Bullet “A” is the 6.5 Grendel. Bullet “B” is the 6.8 SPC

The Grendel’s lead widens a little, (about 200 FPS faster at 500 yards) but not enough to ignore the 6.8 SPC.  Most 6.5 Grendel vs 6.8 SPC loadings will have similar results. (almost identical until about 400-500 yards where the Grendel gains an advantage)

For those who love the SSA 140 grain 6.8 SPC loading, let’s match it up against the 129 Long Range Accubond out of a 6.5 Grendel (available here)  I’m assuming 24″ barrels on both.

6.5 Grendel vs 6.8 SPC Trajectory Heavy Bullets

Bullet “A” is the 6.5 Grendel. Bullet “B” is the 6.8 SPC

That narrows the gap considerably.  Note the trajectories are within 5 inches all the way to 1000 yards. The velocity crossover point is just over 500 yards.  Note: the 6.5 Grendel still drifts less in the wind.  (please also note that this 6.8 SPC loading requires a SPCII chamber and special magazines. The Grendel loading is in spec for length and doesn’t have a Grendel II chamber)

I can sum up all three charts like this:  inside common hunting range (20-200 yards) there is ZERO effective difference.  Let me say that again:

Inside common hunting range there is ZERO effective difference.

If you want a Tactical Cartridge, things don’t really change because there’s ZERO effective difference in lethality.

Both are VERY lethal. (assuming good shot placement)

The only real differences show up at longer ranges.  The Grendel drops less and more importantly, the Grendel Drifts less in the wind.

The 6.5 Grendel drifts 6-7 inches less at 500 yards depending on barrel length.  Not a lot, but it might be the difference between a hit and a miss.   

Further out, things change.

The 6.5 Grendel drifts up to 19 inches less at 750 yards.   That’s a huge difference in ability to land shots at long range.  Granted, that’s a long way and most soldiers couldn’t hit an enemy at that range.

But don’t forget:

In Afghanistan, half of the combat took place under 300 yards.  (where they are basically dead even)

A further 30% took place between 300 and 600 yards.  (even until 500-ish yards then slight advantage Grendel because of drop and drift)

about 20% took place between 600 and 900 yards.  (where the Grendel wins because it drifts less in the wind)

It doesn’t matter how you slice it, beyond 500 yards the Grendel has an advantage because it’s going faster, drops less and drifts less in the wind.  That’s inherent in high sectional density bullets: they are more aerodynamic.

However, the differences don’t show up until 400-500 yards, and they aren’t large.

Which brings me to part everyone misses.

Neither animals nor enemy soldiers can read the headstamp on your brass.

They don’t care.

Both combat and hunting are about the same thing:  Accuracy. You can’t miss fast enough to win a gunfight or fill a hunting tag.

That’s why I like the Grendel better.  The 6.5 Grendel isn’t more accurate than the 6.8 SPC.  They are both VERY accurate cartridges.  However, the long, high Sectional density 6.5 mm bullets ignore the wind better and retain velocity better.

Less wind drift = better shot placement at long range.

The 6.8 is no slouch, but 6.8mm bullets can’t buck the wind like 6.5mm bullets because the 6.5mm bullets have a higher sectional density.

Another huge component of accuracy is practice.

Here the Grendel also has an advantage in cost of ammo.  As I write this in October of 2015, the cheapest 6.8 SPC ammo is around $0.75/round. That’s for just plain old FMJ, which is best for punching paper because it’s not effective for hunting or combat.

You can buy Grendel Ammo for only $0.28/round.

FYI: If you buy after clicking most of the product links on this page, I'll make a few pennies out of each dollar you spend.  It's not much, but it keeps the website going and I would appreciate your support. 🙂

A little math tells me that 6.8 SPC is almost 3 times more expensive than Grendel.  Plus, that $0.28/round Grendel ammo is Wolf’s 100 grain “military classic”, which is constructed like the infamously lethal 7N6 bullet.  It’s deadly stuff.

However, don’t get so wrapped up in the “which cartridge is better” debate that you lose some crucial focus and forget an all important truth:

Your ACCURACY matters WAY more than the cartridge you pick.

I would suggest working on your accuracy because You can’t miss fast enough to win a gunfight or fill a hunting tag.

(NOTE: One of the most accurate 6.5 Grendel barrels is also one of the least expensive.  It’s made by Saturn, has the improved Grendel II chamber, a reputation for excellent accuracy, and comes with a matched bolt of very high quality.  It goes out of stock regularly, so I would grab one when you can.)

P.S. To the Grendel and SPC Fanboys:  Girls you’re both pretty.  Now can you stop bickering and move along?


  1. Matthew March 2, 2016
    • Abe March 2, 2016
  2. Alex March 11, 2016
  3. XLR April 11, 2016
    • Abe April 12, 2016
      • Charles K. Brosdal February 25, 2018
    • Justin December 27, 2019
  4. Yamaraja April 13, 2016
    • Abe April 14, 2016
      • LRRPF52 April 18, 2017
      • Erik August 26, 2017
  5. Ed in Texas April 13, 2016
    • Logan in Kansas January 25, 2018
  6. Robert Hall April 26, 2016
    • Abe April 26, 2016
  7. Robert Hall May 8, 2016
  8. KP May 25, 2016
    • Abe May 25, 2016
      • Logan in Kansas January 25, 2018
    • LRRPF52 April 18, 2017
      • Bob A September 24, 2017
        • Abe (admin) September 24, 2017
      • Wayne April 29, 2020
  9. Thomas July 7, 2016
  10. Tim July 17, 2016
    • Logan in Kansas January 25, 2018
  11. Tim July 17, 2016
    • Tim F November 6, 2016
    • Logan in Kansas January 25, 2018
  12. JOHN DETUERK March 12, 2017
  13. LRRPF52 April 18, 2017
  14. H.C. May 21, 2017
  15. David May 28, 2017
  16. David July 22, 2017
    • Dan September 15, 2017
      • Abe (admin) September 16, 2017
    • Logan in Kansas January 25, 2018
  17. Randal Delbridge November 4, 2017
    • Randal Delbridge November 4, 2017
      • Logan in Kansas January 25, 2018
  18. Dan November 7, 2017
  19. Dino Dan November 8, 2017
    • Logan in Kansas January 25, 2018
      • Steph March 23, 2018
  20. X180A January 21, 2018
    • Logan in Kansas January 25, 2018
      • X180A January 29, 2018
      • X180A January 29, 2018
      • Abe (admin) February 4, 2018
  21. FirstBubba February 9, 2018
  22. Steve March 11, 2018
  23. Zachary Fixter March 12, 2018
  24. Russell July 13, 2018
  25. Rick K. December 27, 2018
  26. Mills1cd January 7, 2019
  27. Eric June 4, 2019
    • Abe (admin) July 5, 2019
  28. Addison March 6, 2020
  29. Addison March 6, 2020
  30. mica July 5, 2020
  31. Phillip October 31, 2020
  32. Curt981 November 24, 2020
  33. Mac December 21, 2020
  34. ThELioN70x7 March 10, 2021

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.